07 March, 2010

Sleeping Though The Oscars

First, let me say, we aren't going to watch the Oscars. Three hours long and it doesn't even start till past our bedtime. I don't think so.

But, in the spirit of things, we did watch one of the contenders tonight - Avatar. I have to say, the special effects were spectacular. But, then I thought the effects in 2012 were spectacular too. It's just that 2012's story was (ahem), shall we say, weak. Yes, we shall.

Avatar's story was good, a bit on the schmaltzy side at times. Both Dianna and I agreed at the end that watching Avatar was a bit like watching Dances With Wolves In Spacesuits. Not that I didn't like Dances With Wolves - far from it. I thought it was a very good movie and it won seven Oscars.

Avatar's a good movie, but I just don't see it as a contender for seven Oscars, much less Best Picture, even though it is nominated for nine, including Best Picture. I guess we'll all find out in the morning, unless you're one of the millions who'll stay up and watch the whole thing.

Generally, the military scenes are pretty good (as they were in Alien, also directed by James Cameron), with the exception of Colonel Quaritch, the private military head - he's just a little too over the top for me - drinking coffee and standing beside the pilot of his craft while they're flying high-speed maneuvers.

I found it interesting that they could manage a human/Na'vi hybrid body, to be inhabited through use of  a mental-link by genetically-matched humans, but were unable to repair former Marine and paraplegic Jake Sully's legs. Seems like fixing his legs would have been child's play by comparison... But, what do I know?

Anyway, I probably wouldn't mind watching Avatar again (I've seen Dances With Wolves several times). I just wonder how long before someone comes out with a pron version where Neytiri and Jake do the nasty?

7 comments:

  1. Did you go over to Chet to see Avatar or enjoy it the comfort of your home?
    We'll be in town on Wednesday. See ya soon.

    Perry

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi Perry & Mischelle,

    None of that cheap 3-, 4-, or 5-D, big screen, THX ultra-enhanced sound stuff for us!

    Nosiree! We watched it the way God intended it - in real 2-D, on a 24" TV with its own speakers. Boy howdy!

    Welcome back guys.

    Cheers,
    Dave

    ReplyDelete
  3. Too bad you couldn't see it 3-D! We saw it once regular 3-D and once on an IMAX 3-D. That movie TOTALLY ROCKED!!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hi Sandy,

    Yeh, I've heard it's pretty amazing in IMAX 3-D. Sort of not an option down here though. Still, special effects were spectacular.

    Cheers,
    Dave

    ReplyDelete
  5. Another vote for the movie in Imax D. Its almost worth coming back to the states to see it. Well......almost.
    :-)

    Bob

    ReplyDelete
  6. Bob,

    No way is Avatar worth traveling from heaven (BZ).

    Dave,

    At some point in the movie it's explained that the technology is there to fix his legs, but he lacks the funds. That was one of the reasons he 'signed on' to his brother's mission.

    Harry

    ReplyDelete
  7. Hi Harry,

    You're right. I remember them talking about the funds for his operation in the flick. I retract the statement I made earlier concerning that issue.

    Thanks for drawing my attention to it.

    Cheers,
    Dave

    ReplyDelete

We want to get your thoughts about our posts, and what you would like to see here.

Unfortunately, adding an image to your comment can't be done directly. The only way you can do it is to include the URL of the image from a hosing server, which means that first, you must upload your image to Flickr, Dropbox, or some other image hosting server.
Not very good, but that's all that is available right now.


To post a YouTube video, simply enter the video URL in the comment box. It will appear in the comment box ready to play.